Some time ago I was mystified by a television
commercial for a book that appeared to be self-published.
In addition, I noticed that the author seemed to have
posted four out of the five reviews that were there at the time, one of them
being remarkably incoherent for an author.
I suppose I was a little judgmental, but now I have
to back off, because tonight I am going to be posting reviews on Goodreads and
Amazon for all five of my books. (Still no plans for a TV commercial.)
I will only post one review each, as myself, and I
will specify that I am the author. I may even write that this feels weird
because I am the author, though if I put that in each review it will get a
little repetitive. It does feel weird. It just also feels necessary.
I would see the prompt to post a review on both
sites frequently, but it didn't feel right. Writing a book is not the same as
reading it, though you do get very familiar with the content.
I do like them. I feel they are good, but then if I
give a good review is it arrogant?
Also, I hardly ever give five stars, I don't think I
should give myself five stars, but then does that look like I don't have
confidence in my work? Because four stars from me is pretty good. I think four
stars is about right.
(It's just that they are fiction, and not trying to
be anything other than a good story, so that's not "It was amazing";
that's "I really liked it".)
It's also weird to put a date on when I read them,
though I am going with the publication date for the books published this year,
and when I was looking over the proofs for the books I published last year.
This will at least up my book count for the year, which is nice.
Or maybe I should just put the publication date for
all of them so it doesn't look like I read the sequel before the original. I
wrote them in the order they happened, to the extent that they did happen.
I'll try and get excerpts up for each book too, but
that may not happen tonight.
What I can tell you happened today is that now that
there is a Family Blood novel trilogy, I revised the Family Blood
screenplay and reloaded it:
I write better now than I did in 2013. (I should.
I've been doing it a lot.)
So now it's like the movie is based on the book, but
the book was based on the movie first. See. It's all weird!
And please, please, please, if you have read any of my books, please post reviews for them. It makes a difference. Thank you!
No comments:
Post a Comment