Party
platforms are interesting things anyway. There are tediously long and boring
documents out of which a few things will be publicized. Then people will only
be reading the excerpts and the gists, and you can’t blame them, because they
are awful.
In
theory, though, what you have is a statement of values. This is what we
consider to be important, and how we are going to make it work. It also may
include a fair amount of sniping, like this leadin to support for mandatory
prison sentences for a long list of crimes:
“Liberals
do not understand this simple axiom: criminals behind bars cannot harm the
general public.”
Anyway,
I wouldn’t even have bothered trying to read the stupid thing if it wasn’t for
a web article I read on the oddest items in the platform—you know, things like
being completely against imposition of sharia law in the United States, and
examining a possible return to the gold standard. Those weren’t what caught my
eye. What got me was a reference to minimum wage in the Marianas Islands:
“The
Pacific territories should have flexibility to determine the minimum wage,
which has seriously restricted progress in the private sector.”
To
show you how obscure it is, the article I was reading referred to them as the
Marinara Islands. I don’t think the writer got it wrong—I think auto-correct
changed it and he didn’t notice, because it seems like such a minor thing
compared to taxes, healthcare, and abortion.
It
struck me because of a book I had read a few years ago, “The Wrecking Crew: How
Conservatives Rule” by Thomas Frank. And really, the Northern Mariana Islands
are a small part of that book, but I remembered.
So
here’s what you need to know. It is a US Territory, so one might expect it to
be similar to the United States, and certainly products made there can be
labeled “Made in USA”, but they are not subject to the same regulations. This
means the regulations to insure product quality, but it especially means
protection and treatment of the workers.
Also,
many of the workers aren’t really US citizens. They’re from nearby countries,
especially China, working as immigrants. They are lied to about what their
situation will be, and sometimes what location they will be going to. In
general if you are rich-and well-connected you do all right, otherwise it is
poverty and abuse and a lot of sex trafficking. However, when people tried to
start reform there, it was fought based on how it would limit the ability of
the Chinese workers to be exposed to Christianity.
That
particular scam is actually old news, having come back to bite Ralph Reed
during a 2006 campaign, that I think even then was overshadowed by the other
Jack Abramoff scandals.
So
how did this obscure issue make it into the 2012 GOP Platform? Well, obviously
someone who is a big party donor is making money off of the low wages there,
and wants to continue to do so. Really, it’s totally a great plan. You can
exploit cheap Chinese labor while still using the Made in the USA label. Why
should you mess that up by treating workers fairly, and paying enough so they
can support themselves without having a prostitution side job? Oh, did I
mention the forced abortions?
We can’t talk about the problems in democracy without
talking about the role of big money, and that is especially true of the
Republican side. So the next thing we’ll talk about is money.
No comments:
Post a Comment