Getting
back to the Hobbit, in the process of this post I am going to reveal that two
of the characters die in the book, therefore I assume they will in the movie.
Actually, make it three. So, if you don’t want to know this, skip the next two
paragraphs.
I
had admitted that I was crushing on two of the characters, and I am not the
only one. Cathy, who went with us, is very fond of Richard Armitage, but he
usually plays nasty characters, and usually dies. I could confirm for her that
Thorin is not a villain, but he will die, along with Fili and Kili.
Yesterday
on Twitter, one girl was angry and lamenting because after seeing the movie she
cannot bear that Kili dies, which she knows from the book. I could not provide much
comfort there. She has about six hours spread out over two years, I guess,
before it happens, but it will happen. Jackson may be making some changes from
the book, but I don’t think he will alter that. (Cathy is simply not going to
see the third movie.)
Finally
today another was saying how it is awful to get attached to people in books
because there is no one like that in real life.
I
have been thinking about this in general. Let me backtrack a little. I am often
interviewed in my mind. I have thought this was an embarrassing sign of vanity
and thinking of myself as special, but apparently this is common, and I think I
understand it now. Sometimes it is helpful to sort out your own thoughts in the
form of a dialogue, because it can create the structure that you need. You are
getting to where you could explain it to someone else, which is important, but
you are doing it for yourself. So if you do this too, don’t feel bad.
I
do this a lot with my writing, because often to make something come right you
need to understand it on different levels. The comic book has been such a huge
part of my life that I have given a lot of interviews about it.
Without
giving too much away, some (mental) interviewer was saying that they loved a
certain character, and my initial response was to cringe a little and warm him
not to get too attached, and then I stopped myself because the whole point is
to get attached.
I
mean, if you’ve been following along, I’ve made no secret of the fact that the
death count is fairly high. This was unexpected, because I started writing it
specifically because I could not leave four people dead, and then I just ended
up killing a bunch more, including three of the original four.
That
wasn’t an accident. The video hit me the way it did because of things I was
already feeling and needed to work out, and some of that is that this is a
harsh world, and bad things happen (a lot) and the mortality rate of life is
100%. That’s just how it turned out, and it hurts and it should hurt. (I guess
my mental interviewers love my characters because I love them.)
And
it is still no reason to not get attached. What makes the hard and painful
moments worthwhile are the relationships and the love that come before and
after. When someone dies, it doesn’t mean that you didn’t love them or they
didn’t love you or that you didn’t have some of your best times with them. That
not only was real; it still is real. Rejecting that because it is temporary
sucks all the beauty and joy out of life.
I
admit that it is easier for me to feel that way because I have complete faith
that it does not end here, and that we will all see each other again. It
doesn’t remove the initial pain of separation, but it does comfort me, and it
infuses everything.
Still,
not everyone believes that, and so I tried to think, if you believed this life
was it, how would that change it? I don’t know the answer, but I believe that
holding onto people—enjoying them, loving them, getting attached to them—would
still result in a more satisfying life. I think it’s at least worth a shot.
When
literary characters die, well, they’re alive again whenever you open the book
back up, and probably in death they are helping you feel and know things that
will relate to life, so there’s something to that.
No comments:
Post a Comment