A few months ago I
was at a party talking to the friend of a friend. He is a drummer, and not
currently in a band, but he knows enough bands that need drummers that he gets
to play pretty often. He also does some studio production work, and having a
lot of contacts helps there as well. That has resulted in a career where he is
doing what he wants to do, he can provide childcare when his wife works, and
between the two of them they are getting by financially.
That wouldn't
satisfy everyone, and not everyone would be able to do it. Obviously it did not
happen all at once. Building contacts happened over time, when he was playing
in bands. What I am getting at is that there are many different ways to be a
musician. The key is to figure out what you want, where you currently are, and
what the path is between those two spots.
If you have a
satisfying day job, but you also play a gig every month or so, and between that
and practices your need to play and spend time with your band is met, that is
great. If that is all you need, but your band is not getting any gigs, then you
need to start checking around with local bars and clubs, and do some
networking. If you are getting a bar gig every other month, and you want to
support yourself and your family by music, or you want to become very wealthy
via music, this is going to require a bigger shift.
Now, about that
band I offended. I don't know for sure that I offended them. As is normal, I
wrote the review, tweeted the link in general with them as a keyword, tweeted
the link specifically to them, and posted it on their Facebook page. A lot of
bands will Like or Favorite or Re-tweet or Share, or reply and thank me, all of
which I love. Sometimes there will be a delay, but usually not more than a week.
In this case, none
of those things happened, but they had a tweet shortly after that about finally
having something interesting to say. I had called their tweets boring and
repetitive. It could be a coincidence, but it felt like an indirect pointed at
me.
I was right though;
they tweet the same things over and over again. If they are happy with their
current level of success, that is fine, though I suspect the tweets are not instrumental
to that level, and could be dropped. However, if they want different results,
they should do different things. My point was that they seem to build loyalty
fairly well with those they spend time with, so build on that. Visit more radio
stations, more event promoters, and put in a lot of face time with fans.
I remember seeing
New Politics when they opened for Fall Out Boy, and just from the performance I
thought they would be successful; they were good! That was reinforced by seeing
Boyd work the crowd. Soren and Louis might have been as well, but where I was
standing it was Boyd, talking to anyone he could, giving out stickers, taking
pictures of people holding the stickers, and engaging in any way he could.
Farewell, My Love
is amazing for use of Twitter. They worked really hard in the beginning to get
everyone to follow all of the individual band members. These members have
endearing personalities, so as more people follow them and see their tweets, it
strengthens the overall attachment for the band.
Also, they are
constantly promoting something, whether it is their crowd-sourcing efforts to
acquire a van, pre-orders, new videos, or new performances. They go through
periodic spurts of repetitive tweets, but then they will offer something new. They
also re-tweet the appreciation they get from followers, which serves multiple
purposes as it reminds followers that they are following a great band, provides
new content so that not everything is about pre-ordering the new CD, and makes
the followers who have been re-tweeted feel good.
And about those
tours, even though they had just completed one tour, and were already booked to
open for Blood On The Dance Floor, they were asking for help in getting onto
another tour. There is no resting on laurels here, and they are smart not to.
Getting established doesn't even mean the same thing it used to now, and you
can't take anything for granted.
The Gin Blossoms
use Twitter in a different way. So far, only two members of the band are on
Twitter, and it took a while to get the second of those on. However, the band
account is really good about following back, passing on good information,
re-tweeting, and giving what access it can. Maybe Robin will not get on
Twitter, but when there is a web site chronicling his trip up Mount Everest, it can at least
link to that.
Of course, the Gin
Blossoms had an existing fan base from back in the day, so while acquiring new
fans is good, a focus on reconnecting with existing fans is a valid approach to
take. Again, you are using what you have.
Even with all that,
Twitter is just one form of social networking, which is just one tool. The
point is that you need to have a realistic view of what success would mean to
you, and how you get there. Record companies are not fairy godmothers, and that's
okay.
Tomorrow we will
talk a bit more about money matters, but as you are building your picture of
success, what I will recommend now is that you include sanity and integrity. I
know that if you don't value them now, my saying so won't change that, but that
doesn't mean that you won't miss them some day.
No comments:
Post a Comment