A friend of
mine lost his job recently.
I found out
when I heard his voice over the news. I looked, and yes, that was his face, and
his name, and him being interviewed about the job loss.
He had, in
frustration over how black lives are given less value by law enforcement and
media, posted something on Facebook about how we should see cops die, and then
there is the funeral and honors and everyone grieves and it was completely
different. That went viral, and his employer fired him.
(I am not
going to name him or his employer, but if you're interested and have not heard
of it, it can be found. Honestly a lot of the online coverage has not been very
good reporting, but for the interview that I saw, I believe he represented
himself well.)
My first
response was to groan and think "Why?", but I still felt that the
firing was unfair. I went to the employer's site and complained. I was generically
thanked for that feedback, which meant absolutely nothing, but I also got a
fair amount of blowback from other people who saw it, and there were some
interesting things about that.
One is that
my friend later told me that the post that went viral showed an edited page,
and he didn't know how that happened. He still had posted something, and Oregon is still at-will employment, so
that doesn't make as much difference as it could, but that still bothered me.
Also, one
of the replies that I got to my post came right out and said that people were
searching for posts in support of Mike Brown and Eric Garner, and those people were
being reported to their employers. I had known about the police calling at
least one Ferguson protester's employer. That was in person, but I couldn't
really be surprised that there was online targeting happening, and that
probably explains how my friend's post got picked up.
In
addition, apparently I almost got a threat. My sister saw one person ask how my
employer would feel about my comments. When I went to look, it was gone,
probably because nothing I said was really incriminating. I said that it was
unfair to fire him over personal speech, and that it was also very clear that
the post was not an actual call for violence - not terribly extreme.
It was
interesting that anyone jumped on my post at all. I did write it on the page,
but it was not linked to a post about the firing or an article. Again, it lends
credibility to people being out there looking for things to jump on.
Their
arguments actually reinforced my support for my friend. I thought what he
posted was a poor choice, but all of the complaints that came at me, and
initial posts on articles I saw, were saying how they would be afraid to shop
at the store where he worked. I don't believe them for a minute. I know he's
not dangerous. While I am sure that - as a tall and muscular black man - they
would be scared to see him in an alley (though he dresses well so would
probably not be wearing a hoodie), I don't think anyone sincerely believed he
was calling for violence or that they would be in danger while he was working.
He said a
shocking thing to make people think. I got that from the beginning. Seeing how
fiercely that is opposed - and not just opposed when seen, but people are
actively seeking out dissent so they can attack livelihoods - that is why you
need freedom of speech. And no, I do not think that means that his employer
can't fire him; it means that his employer shouldn't fire him.
People say
a lot of horrible things, and they may get ignored, or they may get vigorously
defended. "That's satire", "you just don't have a sense of humor",
"they've got a right to say it". Except that when you are arguing
that black lives matter, some people will really go out of their way to stop
you from saying it.
(Or they
will try and hijack it to "All lives matter" which is true, it just
misses the point that black lives are not treated like they matter and that
needs to be addressed.)
There are
people who don't want it addressed. They cannot be allowed to make that
decision.
No comments:
Post a Comment