Yesterday I
mentioned various reading lists, and for those I meant the ones that I have
grouped together and entered into this spreadsheet that I use for
organizational purposes. There are many other books that I plan to read, and
some that I kind of know will be grouped together. This includes some
football-themed books.
One of the
football books is Death to the BCS: The Definitive Case Against the Bowl
Championship Series by Dan Wetzel. Published in 2010, I am sure a lot of it
will be out of date, but I assume that there will be some history there, and
help in analyzing what they are doing now. I guess that is my way of saying
that I am interested in football but not always up on it.
In college
there was time to follow sports, and even for a while after, but I am so busy
now, and watching a football game is not just a time investment; it is also
really stressful. I was working during the Rose Bowl, so I kept the ESPN page
up to check the score. We actually watched most of the Championship game, and
that is why I have thoughts in the first place.
First of
all, I am just thrilled for Marcus Mariota and the Heisman win. Yes, I know he
has other trophies too, but that is a big one, and he is such an outstanding
athlete while being such a good team player and leader that this is how it
should be. Totally appropriate and deserved.
I'm not
sure how I feel about there being a championship. I would probably be more
thrilled with it if the Ducks had won, but I have been against extending
football seasons in general because of some of the things they are finding with
brain injuries. Also, decades ago I read an opinion piece by someone who loved
that both the Orange and Rose Bowl winning teams would
have signs "College Football Champions". The writer found it amusing
and kind of charming, and it swayed me. Now you essentially have one more team
that will end their season with a loss. It doesn't take away what came before,
but still.
There was
not a brain injury that I saw, but there was something flagrant, when Mariota
was tackled after passing. It got an unsportsmanlike conduct call - which it
deserved - but if anyone questions his decision to go to the NFL now, no, it's
really logical for him to do so. You never know how long you will be able to
play.
I get the
concerns for the team about losing a strong player, but there are strong
players left. I was really impressed with Marshall, Tyner is still around, and I have
seen a lot of quarterbacks come and go.
Back in my
day, Bill Musgrave was a really good quarterback, and he felt like a shining
hope, but O'Neil did okay after that, and Harrington really wowed them, and had
his own Heisman campaign, and it just continues.
It's the
same with coaches. Rich Brooks was a step forward, and an important one, but
the team continued to improve under Bellotti. I loved both of them. I took
Football Coaching in spring of 1991, and every single coach taught a session. That's
why I knew and liked them (as people, not just as coaches), but it also gave me
a familiarity with the names, where years later I would still be hearing about
Aliotti or Zoumboukos, or I would see Ratcliffe on the sidelines (still with 0%
body fat). I liked the loyalty. I believe that the sense of continuity, and
promoting from within, has strengthened the organization.
I had no
memories of Chip Kelly, and as he started closing practices and things like
that, I never grew fond of him. It felt like the program was becoming colder
and more business-like. However, the team continued to do well, and he wasn't
the end either, because now Helfrich is doing well. If you want to know how to
build a strong football program, look at Oregon's history.
I also love
that the NCAA agreed that helping parents attend the game was okay. There is so
much money in football, and it could often be spread around better, but this
was a good step.
I think
that's pretty much it. I hope people aren't shunning Carrington too much. I
hope he felt horrible and has learned something, but I hope everyone is moving
past it.
No comments:
Post a Comment