A recurrent
theme has been how different books interact with my learning and thinking. We're
going to have some more of that today.
I read The
Zookeeper's Wife (by Diane Ackerman) because we went to see the movie. That
happened because we saw a trailer for it before A United Kingdom and
thought it looked good. We then heard nothing about the film until we
remembered to look and found it was playing at the second-run theater, so saw
it a bit later than we might have otherwise. Seeing there was a book, we
requested it from the library, where there were many holds. This happens with
books that inspire movies even when they seem to be flying under the radar.
That is why I did not read it until the end of August.
I read it a
month after reading The Origins of Totalitarianism by Hannah Arendt, which
meant that when I read that Antonina was orphaned during the early days of the
Russian Revolution, I was familiar with the Bolsheviks killing the Poles
resident in Russia. I can't tell you now whether that
was actually in the book, or if it was something I encountered when trying to
sort out the Intelligenzaktion when Nazis were killing the Polish elites and
the Katyn massacre, when Soviets were killing Polish officers and
intelligentsia. Nationalists and Communists are supposed to be opposite, but
then when you are reading about them there are so many mass killings that it
can be hard to keep them straight.
I read The
Zookeeper's Wife not long before Hunger and not really that long
after Beauty Sick, which may have made the part about the rations stand
out more.
During the
German occupation of Poland, there were daily calorie
allotments. In 1941, that was 2613 for a German, 699 for a Pole, and 184 for
Jews. That was in the book, but in other sources too. Ackerman phrased it as
something like "The only thing required of you is to disappear."
As much
worse as it was for the Jews, you can see the Poles weren't highly valued
either. They would have eventually been intended for extermination too, but I
suppose the difficulty is that you can't gas everyone at once or shoot everyone
at once. Logistically you can't bury everyone that quickly, but if you
transport some, and crowd some into bad conditions where some will die on their
own until there is room in the camps for the rest, and then once all the Jews
are gone you start on the Poles, and hey, there is a logic behind it.
Incidentally, this is why it is reasonable to assume someone identifying with
Nazis is a bad person.
But that's
not what I'm writing about today.
Today I
writing about how many girls have put themselves on rations like the Nazis put
on the Jews.
I know
there is a sickness involved in taking on the level of self-infliction, but
that sickness is in keeping with the demands of a society that doesn't value
women. When the standard of beauty is always smaller -- more delicate, easier
to look around, easier to push aside -- that is not a society that values
women.
I tried to
imagine a society where the beauty standards favored greater health and
heartiness, and it just wouldn't happen. As long as we have a society where
someone has to be on top and power is important and classifications like gender
and color affect the balance of power, then having a beauty standard that is
literally diminishing is completely logical.
Not
everyone gets a diagnosable psychological disorder from it, but it creates a
lot of unhappiness for the well, too. Frankly, under this kind of order the
diagnostics become harder. That is how you end up with a diagnosis like EDNOS -
eating disorder not otherwise specified - not specifically adhering to
previously understood disorders, but still seriously ill. But that compulsion
to be less would not run nearly so deep if there weren't already so many
reminders, and so many people invested in maintaining that a woman is already
less.
That is why
our feminism needs to be intersectional. We will not resolve any of the
bigotries until we quit needing to push down someone else to feel good about
ourselves. There are probably going to be many, many posts revolving around
that.
For today,
just know that if a system requires you to be less, you need to buck that
system.
No comments:
Post a Comment