I
just finished reading Alan Light's The Holy or the Broken: Leonard Cohen,
Jeff Buckley, and the Unlikely Ascent of "Hallelujah". It was
literally something I read on two days off, so it was a pretty quick read, and
there is no reason that anyone else interested could not read it.
Because
of that, it wouldn't make sense for me to summarize the book and what I
learned. It did put a lot of things that I kind of knew into context, plus
telling me a lot of things that I didn't know, so I appreciate that. I had
thoughts about many things while reading it, and some of them may come out at
some point.
What
I thought I wanted to write today though is a little about the "unlikely
ascent" part. Leonard Cohen's first studio recording of
"Hallelujah" was on an album that the label refused to release. Another
label eventually released it, but it stayed pretty obscure. People who were
into music knew about it, and eventually things started building from it's
inclusion in a movie, Shrek, that did really well after getting
released, but the movie had a lot of trouble getting there.
Once
the movie was successful, that not only led to greater recognition of existing
versions, but many other versions being recorded. Some will say it's overdone,
now. If I were more culturally aware, like if I watched various singing
competition shows, I would have heard it a lot more, and I might feel
differently. Regardless, despite how powerful the song is, and how many people
it has resonated with, it was initially not seen as having that potential.
Sometimes
when I see that an old blog post has been read again, months or years later, I
will go back and read it, and that happened with my post on The Hobbit
recently. All of the previews were so bombastic, and there were so many broad
jokes, and it felt like no one is willing to make a small, quiet movie anymore,
though those are often the best ones.
Putting
them together, I freely admit that there needs to be some attention paid to
finance and commercial concerns. Artists need to eat, there are production
expenses, and that's fine.
If
we are only looking for big hits, though, there will be too many misses. Not
only do we lose out on small, emotionally poignant pieces, but audiences can
get tired of too many big films that all feel the same.
I'm
not exactly saying "Art for art's sake", but the money shouldn't be
more important than the art, or the art doesn't end up being worth very much.
So
I guess one thing that I am grateful for is the many people who do keep
creating, and they do it for love and with love. I do wish them financial
success, maybe just not so much that they lose their spark. And I wish that for
me too.