Cuentos! Hispanic Heritage Month

I was all set to call this "Olla Podrida".

That is a Spanish stew that came up a lot in crosswords. I started thinking must be kind of like hodgepodge, which started as a British stew or soup.

As olla podrida seems to be more of Spain -- rather than Latin America -- I was questioning whether it was really the best option, but then this post took on a theme, becoming less of a mix.

There were originally three books. 

Frizzy, a graphic novel by Claribel A. Ortega and Rose Bousamra, popped up in search results when searching for other things. The title spoke to me.

My kindergarten teacher sister occasionally acquires free books through book fairs and things. She gave me a copy of Esperanza Rising by Pam Muñoz Ryan.

Those were both for middle readers and both very good.

Then along came Celebrating Cuentos: Promoting Latino Children's Literature and Literacy in Classrooms and Libraries, edited by Jamie Campbell Naidoo. 

In addition to my normal interest in children's literature and representation, I am studying education. That was a very natural fit, and interesting to me, though it is geared more toward librarians.

It led me to several more books. 

Actually, I checked out Celebratng Cuentos because Yuyi Morales wrote the foreword, and many of her books were mentioned in it.

(Esperanza Rising was mentioned in it as well; Frizzy is too new.)

The book also introduced me to writer and illustrator Maya Christina Gonzales, whom I thought I should at least check out.

Written by Maya Christina Gonzales:
I Know the River Loves Me/Yo sé que el río me ama
Call Me Tree/Llamame arbol

Illustrated by Maya Christina Gonzales:
Animal Poems of the Iguazú/Animalario del Iguazú by Francisco X. Alarcón
I Can Be... Me! by Lesléa Newman
Fiesta Femenina: Celebrating Women of Mexican Folklore by Mary-Joan Gerson

There is a strong connection to nature in Gonzales' work, which made her a natural for the animalario.

There was also a section on legends and folklore.

Two of the books in that section are Christmas books (you can probably guess from the titles). Looking up holiday books gave me A Very Mexican Christmas: The Greatest Mexican Holiday Stories of All Time from New Vessel Press. I thought, why not? Because these are mostly a bunch of not great stories that are set around Christmas, maybe to make things more depressing or meaningful. 

Not all impulses work out.

Anyway...

Legends and folklore:

The Great Canoe: A Kariña Legend by María Elena Maggi and Gloria Calderón
The Miracle of the First Poinsettia: A Mexican Christmas Story by Joanne Oppenheim and Fabio Negrin
The Golden Flower: A Taino Myth From Puerto Rico by Nina Jaffe and Enrique O. Sanchez
Doña Flor: Un Cuento de Una Mujer Gigante con un Gran Corazón by Pat Mora and Raul Colón
El mejor regalo del mundo: La leyenda de Vieja Belen by Julia Alvarez

Of those, I liked Doña Flor the best for content (though Fiesta Feminina could also fit this category and was very good), but another tricky thing about it was that it was all in Spanish. Three of the Gonzales books had both, but here I was reading in only Spanish, and I had been kind of rusty.

That made it easier to read some shorter works in Spanish from Sandra Cisneros. 

Well, Puro Amor and Hairs/Pelitos both Spanish and English. Has visto a María? only had Spanish.

That felt like kind of a step forward for me. It is there, even though I don't end up using it too much. All of the Spanish works have been pretty short.

For the Cisneros books, Spanish translations were done by Liliana Valenzuela. Has visto a María? was illustrated by Ester Hernandez, and Hairs/Pelitos was illustrated by Terry Ybáñez,

Hairs/Pelitos is a children's book, but with some really good vocabulary stretching, relating to hair.

Has visto a María? could be enjoyed by children. There is some strong grief, but it might go over there heads and on another level it is searching a neighborhood for a cat.

The fun thing with Puro Amor is that it hasn't been too long since I have seen criticism on books about Frida Kahlo that focus on the animalitos. For this book the animalitos play an important role, but do so in exploring the relationship and her health and her relationship with Rivera.

(Cisneros also wrote the foreword to a poetry book I am reading now for Native American Heritage Month.)

Not surprisingly, Celebrating Cuentos spent some time on the various book awards for young readers.

I had previously read some Pura Belpré award winners and more recently become aware of the Tomás Rivera award. 

Two of the best books were focused on them. 

The Storyteller's Candle/La velita de los cuentos, by Lucia Gonzáles and Lulu Delacre, is about children and adults in the Puerto Rican community in New York feeling welcome at the library through Belpré's efforts. 

Tomás and the Library Lady -- Pat Mora and Raul Colón team up again -- is about young Tomás being helped in finding books and feeling welcome.

They are both beautiful examples of the influence a librarian can have.

Celebrating Cuentos is realistic about the challenges, but there is inspiration and motivation to overcome those challenges.

And between focusing on Yuyi Morales and selecting books out of Celebrating Cuentos, this month became mostly about focusing on young readers, which was fine.

There were also the movies, and one other post... 

Hey, some clarity!

There is a group organizing tonight; I had seriously thought about going.

I am not going to name them. They probably will bring some people in and may do good things. They may help people be more active than they have been, which can be really good.

But the more I looked over their materials, the more I revolted.

It feels like the Women's March all over again, where their main form of engagement is going to be applying pressure to elected officials, especially Democrats.

Allow me to say that I am really irritated at the progressives who seem angrier at the Democratic party for not saving them than at the Republican party for wholeheartedly embracing racist fascism. I get that the target is easier, and expecting better makes more sense, but to put that burden on the same people you show only contempt for is not merely counterproductive but also really irritating. Way to learn nothing!

Regardless, there should be organizing and people getting together now. I have been trying to decide what I should do and feeling pretty overwhelmed.

As I was trying to figure out how I felt about this thing specifically, some thoughts did take shape.

One big one was picturing a room full of people without masks. There tends to be a lot of ableism on the progressive side, which would not be helped in such a white area. Is that judging them, yes, but there was nothing in the materials indicating that was even a concern. There may be a possibility of applying positive pressure from within, but I felt tired just thinking about it.

I did remember that when the first Women's March itself turned out to be not what I was hoping for, the March for Equality and Justice was organized for the following week. That was something I could support, and did.

Of course, I suspect that was planned by Black women, and there have been statements that they aren't going to be doing the work for us anymore. That is completely fair.

I don't know that anyone else is going to organize something that will work for me. 

I don't know that I am up for organizing myself.

I do know what I value. That is where the clarity comes in.

First of all, I know that this country's original sin is white supremacy.  

Yes, I will bring in corporatism, capitalism, and colonialism and fold all of that into dominator culture, but the point is that if I do not see an effort to engage with that, I am pessimistic about how effective it can be.

So if there is any talk about focusing on "basics" -- meaning prioritizing class over race, meaning trying to lure in aggrieved whiteness -- I am not interested. We should reach out to people, but not by betraying the most important thing we need to change.

That is clear for me, but it's also a negative. What are my positives?

I think mutual aid is going to be very important, especially in terms of getting people food and shelter and necessities of life, including mental and emotional support. 

That organizing might look more charitable than political. You can run into a lot of white supremacy with NGOs, but that's still something to look for.

I know that libraries have been under attack, but that they are also one of democracy's most important tools. I can look out for the needs of libraries, especially my local one.

If I see organizing that looks at accessibility and disease prevention, we are probably going to be aligned in multiple areas.

I don't know where that will end up, but it's a start.

Related posts:

https://sporkful.blogspot.com/2017/01/i-did-not-march-rally-or-burn-anything.html  

https://sporkful.blogspot.com/2017/01/my-first-march.html 

Daily Songs for Hispanic Heritage Month 2024

In 2022 I read Decoding Despacito: An Oral History of Latin Music by Leila Cobo. I felt like there was a lot more to learn from it and promised I would get back to it.

Trying that this year, I was not nearly as impressed. What I had left to learn was not going to come from that book.

Part of that has been a growing disdain on my part for oral histories. It was exacerbated here by there being so many songs that seemed like they should have been included but were not. Was that because she had no one to interview?

And why did Cobo choose "Whenever, Wherever" instead of "Hips Don't Lie" for Shakira? I think it was just because she wanted to highlight this line:

Lucky that my breasts are small and humble
So you don't confuse 'em with mountains

I did some more searching and found a list of the 50 Greatest Latin Pop Songs by Rolling Stone:

https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-latin-lists/50-greatest-latin-pop-songs-695776/benny-more-bonito-y-sabroso-1951-695801/

The criteria for inclusion here was more clear: these were supposed to be songs that had an influence. Some of the writers made better cases than others, but I still felt like there were exclusions. 

(They did cite "Hips Don't Lie" though.)

Rolling Stone mentioned Richie Valens' "La Bamba", but not the Los Lobos version. There was also a mention of Latin pop having a resurgence that would coincide with Los Lobos, and I believe they had an influence. 

No one mentioned "Rico Suave", but it at least put a new phrase into the lexicon.

"Bang Bang" was mainstream enough to end up in a King of the Hill episode.

No one mentioned the Gypsy Kings either, but they did allow other musicians from Spain. I admit the history of Roma people being expelled from Spain gets complicated, but a lot of this is complicated, when you look at it.

Rolling Stone even allowed a song in Portugese, Kaoma;s "Lambada". They only mentioned one of the terrible movies inspired by it, though. There were two. (Apparently Golan and Globus split up on it; usually they just make one terrible movie together.)

I was going to listen to everything and choose the ones I liked, but it eventually felt right to use all of them, plus some songs that were mentioned but not featured in each work, plus some songs that I remembered.

This resulted in the longest list of songs for one month ever, running from September 17th through November 24th. 

They are in chronological order with one exception. Before I decided I would use everything I was going to skip "Feliz Navidad" (1970), as I had used it before. It became the last song, leading into Christmas music.

That still did not feel like quite enough, so I took a few musical styles that had either been mentioned or that I thought I remembered being mentioned. Those genres were son, bachata, reggaeton, dancehall, and cumbia. I looked them up on Wikipedia as well as finding which ones were mentioned in the article as relating to those genres, and found songs for additional listening that way. 

I'm not an expert now. For one thing, some of them -- especially son -- have many different regional versions. Still, I know more.

There is also some really interesting political history regarding how things were popularized and why, especially for the Dominican Republic. 

There is always more to learn.

The notations on where the song came from are pretty obvious, but just in case...

DD = Decoding Despacito
RS = the Rolling Stone list
* = the song was mentioned in the cited work, but not one of the featured songs
MM = from my memories (maybe that one wasn't obvious)

Daily songs:

9/17 “Cherry Pink and Apple Blossom White” by Dámaso Pérez Prado (1950) DD*
9/18 “Bonito y Sabroso” by Benny Moré (1951) RS
9/19 “¡Que rico el mambo!” by Dámaso Pérez Prado (1952) DD*
9/20 “La Bamba” by Ritchie Valens (1958) RS
9/21 “Mas Que Nada” by Sergio Mendes and Brasil ’66 (1966) RS
9/22 “Bang Bang” by Joe Cuba Sextet (1966) MM
9/23 “Oye Como Va” by Santana (1970) RS
9/24 “Contrabanda y traición” by Los Tigres del Norte (1974) DD
9/25 “Periodico De Ayer” by Héctor Lavoe (1976) RS
9/26 “Plástico” by Rubén Blades and Willie Colon (1978) RS
9/27 “Querida” by Juan Gabriel (1984) RS
9/28 “Amor Eterno” by Rocío Dúrcal (1984) RS
9/29 “Yo No Te Pido la Luna” by Daniela Romo (1984) RS
9/30 “La Jaula de Oro” by Los Tigres del Norte (1984) RS
10/1 “To All the Girls I’ve Loved Before” by Julio Iglesias & Willie Nelson (1984) DD
10/2 “Conga” by Miami Sound Machine (1985) RS, DD
10/3 “Ay Amor” by Ana Gabriel (1987) RS
10/4 “La Bamba” by Los Lobos (1987) MM
10/5 “Bamboléo” by Gipsy Kings (1987) MM
10/6 “La Negra Tomasa” by Caifanes (1988) RS
10/7 “La Incondicional” by Luis Miguel (1988) RS
10/8 “Tu y Yo Somos Uno Mismo” by Timbiriche (1988) RS
10/9 “Dr. Psiquiatra” by Gloria Trevi (1989) RS
10/10 “Lambada” by Kaoma (1989) RS
10/11 “Como la Flor” by Selena (1989) RS
10/12 “El gran varón” by Willie Colon (1989) DD
10/13 “Tren al Sur” by Los Prisioneros (1990) RS
10/14 “Burbujas de amor” by Juan Luis Guerra & 4.40 (1990) RS, DD
10/15 “Rico Suave” by Gerardo (1991) MM
10/16 “Tu Pun Pun” by El General (1991) RS
10/17 “Oye Mi Amor” by Maná (1992) RS
10/18 “El Matador” Los Fabulosos Cadillacs (1993) RS
10/19 “El Tiburón” by Proyecto Uno (1993) RS
10/20 “La Gota Fría” by Carlos Vives (1993) RS
10/21 “Macarena” (Bayside Boys Remix) by Los del Río (1994) RS, DD
10/22 “Amor Prohibido” by Selena (1994) DD
10/23 “Ese Hombre” by La India (1994) RS
10/24 “María (Pablo Flores Remix)” by Ricky Martin (1995) RS
10/25 “La tierra del olvido” by Carlos Vives (1995) DD
10/26 “Comó Te Voy A Olvidar” by Los Ángeles Azul (1996) RS
10/27 “Suavemente” by Elvis Crespo (1998) RS
10/28 “Smooth” by Carlos Santana & Rob Thomas (1999) DD
10/29 “Livin’ La Vida Loca” by Ricky Martin (1999) DD
10/30 “Waiting For Tonight” by Jennifer Lopez (1999) RS
10/31 “La Negra Tiene Tumbao” by Celia Cruz (2001) RS
11/1 “Whenever, Wherever” by Shakira (2001) DD
11/2 “Obsesión” by Aventura feat. Judy Santos (2002) RS
11/3 “A Dios le Pido” by Juanes (2002) RS
11/4 “Pa’ Que Retozen” by Tego Calderón (2002) RS
11/5 “Eres” by Café Tacvba (2003) RS
11/6 “Quiero Bailar” by Ivy Queen (2003) RS
11/7 “Algo Esta Cambiando” by Julieta Venegas (2003) RS
11/8 “Gasolina” by Daddy Yankee (2004) RS, DD
11/9 “Za Za Za (Mesa Que Mas Aplauda)” by Grupo Climax RS
11/10 “Atrévete-Te-Te” by Calle 13 (2005) RS
11/11 “Hips Don’t Lie” by Shakira feat. Wyclef Jean (2006) RS
11/12 “Fuego” by Bomba Estéreo (2008) RS
11/13 “Danza Kuduro” by Don Omar feat. Lucenzo (2010) RS
11/14 “Inténalo” by 3BallMTY (2011) RS
11/15 “Cómo Puedes Vivir Contigo Mismo” by Alex Anwandter (2011) RS
11/16 “Vivir Mi Vida” by Marc Anthony (2013) RS, DD
11/17 “Bailando” by Enrique Iglesias, featuring Sean Paul, Descemer Bueno & Gente de Zona (2014) RS, DD
11/18 “Ginza” by J Balvin (2015) RS
11/19 “El Taxi” by Pitbull feat. Sensato, Osmani Garcia and Dayami La Musa (2015) RS
11/20 “Despacito” by Luis Fonsi, featuring Daddy Yankee & Justin Bieber (2017) RS, DD
11/21 “Mi Gente” by J Balvin and Willy William (2017) DD
11/22 “Malamente” by Rosalia (2018) DD
11/23 “I Like It” by Cardi B., Bad Bunny, J. Balvin (2018) RS*
11/24 “Feliz Navidad” by Jose Feliciano (1970) DD

Related posts:

https://sporkful.blogspot.com/2022/12/hispanic-heritage-month-2022-songs.html 

Futile?

I deleted another friend on Facebook.

He was gloating that the pardon means Hunter is guilty. (The first person I deleted chimed in too.)

I don't believe there was ever any dispute about the paperwork being filled out incorrectly; the question was whether it needed to be a federal case or not, and whether anything beyond politics was causing that level of prosecution.

Now that it is clear that the persecution would only get worse, I have no problem with President Biden deciding not to martyr his son to some sense of propriety. It is clear that no amount of good examples is going to have any effect on the incoming crew.

In trying to do multiple posts explaining things, I started to get a real sense of frustration with the repetition of it all. I've said that. People know that. If they don't know it, it's because they don't want to know it.

I guess my thought was that if there were nuances that people didn't know, putting them out there could help, but honestly it doesn't feel very useful.

It is more about whom we are, but there is one more type (perhaps two), where I just need to put it out there.

If someone religious supported Trump for reasons of righteousness, please call them on that.

Again, we have talked about how banning abortion doesn't really save babies, but it sure does oppress women. 

Do pro-life voters really know that?

Some of them absolutely know, but the oppression of women is kind of a turn-on for them. That does not just apply to men, but also often to women who feel like they are special by standing on the backs of other women.

There are probably also people who don't interact very much with others outside of a small circle. They may not know. They may believe that any woman having an abortion is doing so with a callous disregard for human life, and that is what is being stopped. 

I have seen doctors arguing that no doctor would really withhold life saving care from a woman miscarrying, and that the law doesn't really require it, except it keeps happening. Then when a commission looks into it, they get disbanded. 

https://www.propublica.org/article/georgia-dismisses-maternal-mortality-committee-amber-thurman-candi-miller

That at least has to make you wonder, right?

For most religions -- and certainly the many flavors of Christianity (except for Westboro Baptist) -- hating people, dehumanizing them, judging them, and trying to seize control of their genitals is not allowed. If they do believe it, they should be at least capable of feeling guilty for being called on it.

It might not work. They might get huffy. Still, if a little wiggle of doubt can sink in from your words, that's worth something.

For these people whom I have deleted, I have clearly decided it is not worth it. Protect your peace; the future will bring many assaults on it.

But if you can believe that someone's humanity is still within reach and appeal to that, it's worth a try.

... we are each other’s
harvest:
we are each other’s
business:
we are each other’s
magnitude and bond.

 -- Gwendolyn Brooks, from  Paul Robeson

Wrong!

Yesterday's post focused on inflation and the economy. Those are things that people might reasonably look at when deciding between candidates.

(For all the reasons that I mentioned for why prices won't go down under Trump, I can't believe I forgot to mention that the proposed roundup of undocumented immigrants will wreak havoc on agriculture. It did last time.)

Other almost reasonable policy issues that I have already written about are foreign policy, especially as it relates to Palestine and Israel, and the draft.

https://sporkful.blogspot.com/2024/10/some-thoughts-on-strategy.html

https://sporkful.blogspot.com/2024/12/i-am-angry.html 

My saying "almost reasonable" rather than "reasonable" should be obvious from the posts, so I don't want to spend a lot of time on that.

There were also some concerns mentioned about Biden's age before he stepped down. I already wrote about that:

https://sporkful.blogspot.com/2024/10/election-2024-some-thoughts-on-bidens.html 

(That should be ironic in light of Trump's own narcissistic incoherence, but irony is starting to lose all meaning in this timeline.)

There were conservatives making fun of him, as there had been all along, but I still feel he was governing well. 

There were also Democrats wanting him to step down as well, and then they got mad at him endorsing Harris. 

It looks like for at least part of them, the hope was to install a younger white man, most likely Gavin Newsome. They blame this loss on the party running the wrong candidate.

Newsome would have lost too. 

It pains me to say it, but I don't think that Democrats had a clear path to victory for this election. 

If you remember the work it required to turn Georgia blue in 2020, that would have been needed in multiple states. Between local and state governments in states with more influence in the electoral college, that would be hard. It would have been worth it, but it didn't happen.

We need to consider that there are votes that will not be counted, but also votes that did not get cast due to strong efforts at voter suppression and voter disenfranchisement. Yes, there has been harassment at the polls in other elections where Trump was running, but I think this is the first time that polling places in neighborhoods that would have leaned toward Harris had to close due to bomb threats that originated in Russia.

There has also been a remarkable lack of fairness and coverage of important issues in the press. That means that fighting disinformation doesn't mean merely releasing statements highlighting good work and policies, but creating new news channels. 

Yes, a lot of our citizens are racist and misogynistic; they do not want to vote for the daughter of a Black man and Indian woman. 

That racist misogyny makes them love Trump. Newsome's whiteness is not enough to compensate for him being less committed to white supremacy.

The other reason that a lot of them give is that Democrats keep talking about DEI, and have thus abandoned the working class.

Allow me to note that "working class" is not exclusively white men. The pro-union positions that Biden and Harris were taking were clearly not an abandonment, for people like James Carville and Bernie Sanders, white male grievance is a drug that's hard to quit.

Allow me to also note that is was not Democrats talking about it. Conservatives talk about it a lot more as a scare tactic.

To have a woman of color running does show to some extent that the Democrats are trying to live diversity, equity, and inclusion, while still choosing qualified candidates with experience and interest in public service.

Newsome might have been less of a reminder, but he would still be a very poor substitute for Trump.

The really hard part is admitting that so many people want him.

Somehow Democrats are expected to make that better, and to do so by coddling the ones who thrive on the racism and misogyny. 

I am pretty sure it would not be worth selling our souls, even if it would work, but I am positive that it would not work. 

I hate that, but denial isn't going to save us. 

Personally, I could write more posts about how various talking points are wrong and why, but I am not sure how valuable it is.

I saw one person say that he voted for Trump even though he doesn't like Trump but did it to prevent the United States becoming communist. I have seen others lament RFK Jr. dropping out because he had so much integrity.

I try not to throw around the word "stupid", but for someone who needs those things explained, I don't know that this is the best use of my time.

It really is more about how we need to be as people. 

Of course, that does play right into a few more talking points.