Monday, September 16, 2013

Scandal!


My thoughts here are probably going to be poorly organized, but I'm going for it anyway.
The train of thought started with Jeff Cogen, as the news items started that would turn him into a former Multnomah County Chairman:
Initially everyone was insisting that he played no role in Sonia Manhas getting her position, which based on this article looks less true than it originally seemed. Even if that had been true, perhaps the best illustration of how things go wrong would be when it came out that Manhas got the budget she requested, which doubled it from the previous year.
Now, there may have been valid reasons for doubling the budget, but once you find out that the approver is having an affair with the requester, it looks pretty fishy. If the relationship had been disclosed then you could do things like having a third party review the request, though this might just be one of those situations where you don't want people having personal relationships, but of course, there is adultery involved, so no one wanted to disclose.
The point is that by all accounts Cogen was doing a good job, but that's sunk. Too many of his decisions can be called into question now, and because the trust is lost, his abilities are now lost.
It was the right thing to resign - his attempts to fight it initially showed bad judgment - but obviously the much better thing to have done would have been to not cheat on his wife. If there are problems in the marriage, deal with them openly and honestly. Secrets get in the way.
Obviously we could make correlations to Anthony Weiner here, and we could spend a lot of time talking about stupid men and the dogs they are, but that's not really what is eating at me here, so I am going to share another story, that is very gossipy in nature.
About two years ago there was controversy over Portland's reluctance to participate in the join-terrorism task force because they would not have access to full information. Now, the rumor I cannot substantiate is that the information issue was actually that two relevant people were not approved after their background checks.
Now, at that point, we all already knew about Beau Breedlove, so it's not necessarily a Sam Adams issue, but I think the reminder there is that if you have sensitive information, you do not want someone who is vulnerable to blackmail. You don't want decisions made by people whose judgment has been compromised by other things they have done.
Perhaps the ridiculous part is that people are really very forgiving about those who are open. People tried to take Weiner back. Spitzer is not still living in disgrace. Adams is finishing his term, and a beloved extra on Portlandia. You can debate whether that's a good thing or not, but that's how it goes. That's not to say that no one would have any qualms about politicians never hiding their sex habits, but when you are unapologetic a lot of people seem to accept that no apology is required.
Once you keep things secret, though, you have created a weakness, and it's a weakness that can be a breeding ground for all sorts of problems.

No comments: