Actual parents of teenage girls are welcome to
disagree, but there's a reason why I titled the post this way.
Part of what I am working now involved a second
evaluation of the books for the long reading list. I did that when I first
completed it, but now there have been other life experiences, other books, and
treating them all together meant that I didn't go into any of them in depth. As
I went over them again, new patterns emerged, and eventually I will write about
all of them here.
I want to treat three books together for this post,
and the one that ended up being most valuable to me was not the one I expected.
Reviving Ophelia: Saving the Selves of
Adolescent Girls by Mary Pipher, 1994.
I read this many years ago. There were things that
stuck out and that I remembered later, but mainly I remember making a note to
myself that I needed to read it again before I had adolescent daughters. That
never happened, but then when I was thinking about teenage girls, and myself,
it made sense to look at it again.
It made less of an impression on me this time,
probably because I never started parenthood to take it to the next level. That
didn't make it bad, but I'd already read it, and maybe moved beyond it.
What stuck with me most this time was her analysis
of parenthood, breaking it down along two continua of control and acceptance.
Reducing it to very basic terms ant looking at the long range (because issues
will come up at different times regardless), it goes like this...
Low control
and low acceptance tends to result in delinquency and chemical dependence. High
control and low acceptance would be authoritarian parents, and their children
often lack confidence and are socially inadequate. Low control and high acceptance,
or indulgent parents, can end up with impulsive, irresponsible, and not very
independent teenagers. High control and high acceptance tends to produce
independent, responsible, confident children.
I didn't
love that phrasing, because control has very negative connotations for me, and
I have a hard time viewing it as positive. Maybe if you are also accepting it
keeps you from being strict about stupid things, but you are still firm when it
counts.
The other
interesting thing for me was that I had read two books really close together
where adopted children were having a had time feeling connected, and it led to
dangerous ambivalence. Reviving Ophelia is full of specific examples,
and they had an adoptive family that dealt successfully with connecting. It was
good to remember that could be done. I still appreciate the book, you can get
good things from it, but it isn't the one.
Queen
Bees and Wannabes: Helping Your Daughter Survive Cliques, Gossip, Boyfriends,
and Other Realities of Adolescence by Rosalind Wiseman, 2002.
Not only
did this have good word of mouth but it inspired a hit movie; of course it was
going to be great, right?
It wasn't
bad, but it spends a lot of time trying to take an anthropological approach,
and that comes through in the movie but there are two problems with it. One is
that it felt to me like a conceit, trying to be clever. Not only was that
mildly irritating, but for a parent who cares and is worried and is looking for
guidance, I can't imagine that it would be appreciated.
Later on in
the book there were parts that were helpful for discussing issues like drugs
and rape and mental illness, and I think it can be really helpful there. If I
was responsible for having those kinds of discussions, I could see looking up
this book again.
Those were
both books I had heard of in magazines and newspapers. The best one came from a
Facebook thread, where a friend from school had a daughter who was being picked
on by other girls, and one of the people recommended this book. After I read
it, I could see why.
Odd Girl
Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in Girls by Rachel Simmons, 2001.
I think one
thing that made this book effective was its sympathy for the bullies. I did not
want to feel sympathy for them. No parent whose child is on the receiving end
of shunning and abuse is going to want to feel sympathy for those girls, but
it's also really common for those girls to switch places. There were girls who
shunned first and then were shunned later. Can you have sympathy for your child
when they do wrong things? Of course! So then you can also see the other side.
Simmons
goes into the reasons for the aggression, girls are not given enough outlets.
It's fifteen years old, so maybe some things have improved, but these are
behaviors that were happening in the 50s and 60s, so odds are it's still
relevant.
It hit home
more shortly after finishing the book, when I was at the dentist. The hygienist
and I were talking, and her daughter had been through a period of isolation,
and we talked about how they handled that (parents and school did great, by the
way, which was really encouraging), but now the girls are friends again.
Without her
really saying it, I gathered that was an adjustment, because these are girls
who betrayed her daughter, and made her really miserable, but the girls had
moved on, so she had to. It's not easy.
I do think
this book helps, so this is the book I recommend. This is the best one -- at
least out of what this non-parent (who reads a lot) knows.
No comments:
Post a Comment